[pjw] NEWS: US Military Pulls Out of Libyan Capital as Rival Militias Battle (NY Times 4/7)
Peace and Justice Works
pjw at pjw.info
Sun Apr 7 18:35:53 EDT 2019
Peace and Justice Works supporters
It is VERY interesting to me that both this story and a version of it I
heard on the radio refer to the "ouster of Qaddafi," (here the NYT uses
that term twice) with out mentioning that the US bombed the living
daylights out of the country, leading to chaos, people literally tearing
Qaddafi limb from limb, and wreaking the havoc that has been Libya's
essential civil war in the 8 years since.
Anyway, here's the news for today from yet another country suffering the
aftermath of US military policy.
--dan h
peace and justice works iraq affinity group
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/07/world/africa/libya-us-troops.html
U.S. Military Pulls Out of Libyan Capital as Rival Militias Battle
By [12]David D. Kirkpatrick
* April 7, 2019
The United States military evacuated its small contingent of troops
from the Libyan capital on Sunday as rival militias raced to stop the
forces [13]of an aspiring strongman, Gen. Khalifa Hifter, from taking
control of the city.
Forces under the command of General Hifter [14]made a surprise advance
on the outskirts of the capital, Tripoli, on Thursday, setting up a
battle with a coalition of armed factions from the region around the
city ? the grand prize in a chaotic eight-year fight for control after
the ouster of the dictator Muammar el-Qaddafi during the Arab Spring
revolts.
Tripoli is the northern African country?s financial hub, receiving the
income [15]from sales of Libyan oil, housing the central bank and
paying the salaries of soldiers and other public employees across the
country.
By Sunday morning, both sides had begun attacking from the air, using
the small and primitive air forces at their command, but the exact
targets and extent of the damage could not be immediately determined.
The United States State Department, which previously joined a call by
several countries for restraint from both sides, shifted on Sunday to
urging General Hifter to pull back.
?The United States opposes the military offensive? by his forces ?and
urges the immediate halt to all military operations against Tripoli,
and return to status quo positions,? the State Department said in a
statement attributed to a senior official.
General Hifter, 75, already has at least loose control over most of
eastern Libya, as well as important parts of the southern desert. His
forces? advance on Tripoli this past week has now put him in striking
distance of fulfilling a five-year-old vow to reunite Libya under his
rule.
Some analysts, however, say that he has extended his supply lines so
far that without a quick victory, he could be forced into a
humiliating retreat.
General Hifter?s forces appeared to have maintained control of the
defunct international airport since Friday evening, putting them
within 17 miles of the Mediterranean coast and Tripoli?s central
square.
Residents of Tripoli said that the two sides had spent the days
mobilizing and deploying their forces, with a more pitched battle
expected on Sunday. By afternoon, residents reported that the
coalition of Tripoli-area militias was fighting to drive General
Hifter?s forces out of the town of Aziziya, about 20 miles southwest
of Tripoli.
The United Nations mission in Libya called on Sunday for a
humanitarian truce for two hours later in the day to evacuate the
wounded from Aziziya, the area around the airport and another
location.
By night, General Hifter?s forces appeared to have advanced slightly
on one front while falling back slightly on another. About 20 people
had died and about 25 others were wounded, according to tallies by the
Libyan Red Crescent.
Representatives of the United Nations mission in Libya said on Sunday
that it remained active in Libya and had not evacuated. But the United
State military personnel left by boat on Sunday morning, according to
a resident who provided photographs of the ship as it departed.
The United States military?s Africa Command said in a statement that
its mission in Libya had included providing support to diplomatic
efforts, as well as ?counterterrorism activities.?
?The security realities on the ground in Libya are growing
increasingly complex and unpredictable,? Gen. Thomas D. Waldhauser of
the Marine Corps, the head of United States Africa Command, said in
the statement. ?Even with an adjustment of the force, we will continue
to remain agile in support of existing U.S. strategy.?
Libya collapsed into a patchwork of city-states after the ouster of
Colonel Qaddafi. Each city established its own militia and multiple
militias competed for control of the two largest cities, Tripoli in
the west and Benghazi in the east. In Tripoli, some of the dominant
militias have also profited from extortion, migrant trafficking and
other illegal activities, according to residents and United Nations
observers.
General Hifter, a former officer in Colonel Qaddafi?s army, once
sought to lead a coup against him and then lived in Virginia as a
C.I.A. client. He returned during the uprising against Colonel Qaddafi
in 2011, and from a base in eastern Libya, he has received extensive
backing from Egypt and the United Arab Emirates, both of which have
sought to restore some version of the old authoritarian order as a way
to stabilize the country.
In more recent years, France has provided military assistance in the
hope that General Hifter could help stop the free flow of migrants and
extremists through the Sahara to the south, and Russia has helped him
print currency in order to restore liquidity to the economy in areas
under his control.
The United States has publicly backed the attempts of the United
Nations to set up an alternative government in Tripoli that may unify
the warring factions. But [16]without any significant military force
of its own in the country, the United Nations-backed government has
remained dependent on local militias for security. And General Hifter
has not shown any willingness to submit to civilian authority.
The advance of his forces toward Tripoli has brought together a new
coalition to stop him, including several militias based in the city,
as well as powerful brigades from the cities of Misrata, on the coast,
and Zintan, in the mountains to the west.
Analysts say that the next phase of the battle may turn on the
question of whether that coalition holds together or any of its
components break ranks to strike an accommodation with General Hifter.
The United States military has sought to remain neutral between the
United Nations? so-called Government of National Accord, or G.N.A., on
one hand, and General Hifter?s forces, which he calls the Libyan
National Army, or L.N.A., on the other.
?We don?t want to get in front of the diplomatic effort, and we want
to maintain our neutrality,? General Waldhauser explained in remarks
to the news media at a security conference in Munich in February,
?because it?s very, very important that we don?t, all of a sudden,
back one side that turns the other way.?
The Libyan militias ?change allegiances quite regularly,? General
Waldhauser continued. ?And so our U.S. position has always been and
continues to be to support the G.N.A. But at the same time, you know,
Hifter and the L.N.A. are a factor there, and whatever solution comes
to pass is going to involve the L.N.A. and Hifter.?
To prepare for all possibilities, General Waldhauser said, ?we support
the G.N.A. but we have lines of communications open with others,?
including General Hifter.
On Sunday, the State Department said that ?the administration at the
highest levels has made clear its deep concern about fighting near
Tripoli.?
It added: ?All involved parties should urgently de-escalate the
situation, which is endangering civilians and undermining prospects
for a better future for all Libyans.?
Eric Schmitt contributed reporting from Washington, and Suliman Ali
Zway from Berlin.
More information about the pjw-list
mailing list