[pjw] NEWS: Initial findings suggest Ukriaine fired missile that hit Poland (CNBC 11/16)
Peace and Justice Works
pjw at pjw.info
Wed Nov 16 13:25:37 EST 2022
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 10:20:18
From: Peace and Justice Works <pjw at pjw.info>
To: Peace and Justice Works <pjw at pjw.info>
Subject: NEWS: Initial findings suggest Ukriaine fired missile that hit Poland
(CNBC 11/16)
Supporters of peaceful conflict resolution
While "World War III" has been trending on anti-social media after news that a
missile hit Poland and killed two people, the US and NATO seem to agree that it
was Ukraine which fired that missile. They blame Russia anyway. I suppose
there's some logic to that-- after all, for instance, Fred Bryant died of the
stress he endured from protesting the Portland Police killing his son Keaton
Otis, and the community blames Fred's death on the police. But the fact remains
that NATO should not start invoking its mutual defense pact to defend Poland if
Russia itself did not deliberately attack that country. In theory, it means NATO
should attack Ukraine (that's a joke, but an interesting concept).
Anyway, here's the CNBC article whose initial headline was "Ukraine reacts as
initial findings suggest it fired the missile at Poland" but some enterprising
editor changed it to "Kyiv says Poland strike a `very sensitive issue,' wants to
see evidence that its forces fired missile." But there's no media bias in this
war, the corporate media is 100% neutral (that's also a joke).
dan handelman
peace and justice works iraq affinity group
PS don't forget Medea Benjamin is talking about Ukraine tonight at the First
Unitarian Church at 7 PM, if you are ok with an indoor event where masking is
optional.
---------------
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/11/16/ukraine-reacts-as-initial-findings-suggest-it-fired-the-missile-that-hit-poland.html
Kyiv says Poland strike a `very sensitive issue,' wants to see evidence that
its forces fired missile
Published Wed, Nov 16 20225:12 AM EST
Updated 3 Hours Ago
Holly Ellyatt at HollyEllyatt
Key Points
* Ukraine's Defense Ministry was cautious Wednesday as evidence
mounted that its own armed forces fired a missile that hit Poland.
* Several media reports cited Western officials as saying initial
assessments suggested the missile was fired from a Ukrainian air
defense system.
* Ukraine's Defense Ministry said the issue was "very sensitive" and
welcomed a thorough investigation.
Ukraine's Defense Ministry responded cautiously to mounting evidence
suggesting its own armed forces fired a missile that hit Poland,
killing two people -- saying the issue was "very sensitive" and that it
wanted its own officials to be able access the site where the incident
took place.
Early Wednesday morning, The Associated Press reported, citing three
unnamed U.S. officials, that preliminary assessments indicated "the
missile that struck Poland had been fired by Ukrainian forces at an
incoming Russian missile."
Other media agencies, including NBC News, cited similar details on
Wednesday; Reuters reported a NATO source as saying President Joe Biden
had told the G-7 and NATO partners that the strike was caused by "a
Ukrainian air defense missile," while The Wall Street Journal cited two
senior Western officials briefed on the preliminary U.S. assessments as
saying the missile was from a Ukrainian air defense system.
Those initial findings were then confirmed by NATO on Wednesday morning
with Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg telling reporters that while
investigations continue, the strike was likely caused by a Ukrainian
air defense missile but that, ultimately, Russia was "responsible for
the war that has caused this situation."
Earlier Wednesday, Ukraine's Defense Ministry was cautious about the
initial assessments of the incident. Yuriy Sak, an advisor to Ukraine's
defense minister, Oleksiy Reznikov, told CNBC that Kyiv welcomed a
thorough investigation of the incident and said the issue was "very
sensitive."
"It is too early to give any definitive answers and it's very dangerous
to jump to any conclusions," Sak said Wednesday morning.
"I would like to just stress once again that right now, the president
of Poland has said that there are no conclusive evidence of what
exactly has happened. Joe Biden, when he was making his comment, he was
also cautious because everybody understands that this is a very
sensitive issue," he said.
"Before any conclusions are made, an investigation must be done. So,
that is where we stand," he said.
After NATO's comments, Oleksiy Danilov, head of Ukraine's National
Security and Defense Council, tweeted that Kyiv favored a "joint study"
into the incident. Danilov said on Twitter that Ukraine was "ready to
hand over the evidence of the Russian trail that we have" but Kyiv was
still awaiting "information from our partners, on the basis of which a
conclusion was made that it is a Ukrainian air defense missile."
He added that Ukraine had requested that Defense Ministry and border
guard officials be granted immediate access to the site of the
explosion.
Missile hit context
Tuesday night's incident came after Ukraine suffered a wave of missile
strikes by Russia with one Ukrainian official saying more than 90
missiles were fired at the country. The attacks knocked out energy
infrastructure across Ukraine, reportedly leaving 7 million people
without power.
For its part, Ukraine blamed Russia for the missile that hit Poland on
Tuesday night, with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy reportedly telling
his Polish counterpart that it was "a rocket launched from the
territory of the Russian Federation." Russia said it had not fired the
missile and called it a "deliberate provocation in order to escalate
the situation."
Ukrainian defense official Sak told CNBC that Ukraine's international
allies should have responded to Kyiv's repeated requests for them to
impose a no-fly zone over Ukraine.
NATO refused to do that early in the war, fearing it would be dragged
into a direct conflict with nuclear power Russia.
"What we want to stress is that if there was no invasion of Ukraine,
yesterday would not have happened. If the Ukrainian sky would have been
closed at our request by our allies, this would not have happened," Sak
said, echoing comments by British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak who said
Wednesday morning that "none of this would be happening if it wasn't
for the Russian invasion of Ukraine."
Sak said it was crucial that the missile incident didn't distract from
Ukraine's defense needs.
"It is very important that we don't shift the focus now and that we
continue to discuss the options for further closing the Ukrainian sky,
providing Ukraine with efficient air defense systems, because what
needs to happen is that we need to all collectively make sure that such
tragic incidents as yesterday do not happen again," he said.
As a flurry of urgent and high-level diplomatic talks are taking place
among NATO members on Wednesday, defense analysts agreed that, whether
Russia fired the missile or not, it bears a lot responsibility for the
attack.
"Russia is to some degree culpable regardless, because it's firing
missiles on civilian infrastructure targets, and firing them
dangerously close to NATO territory and the Ukrainian-Polish border,
and Ukraine needs to defend itself," Samuel Ramani, a geopolitical
analyst and associate fellow at the Royal United Services Institute
defense think tank, told CNBC on Wednesday.
"But it may not be that Russia intentionally targeted Poland, and it
could be Ukraine doing it. So right now, I think we need an
investigation to figure out what's really happening."
More information about the pjw-list
mailing list